Hogan Motor Vehicle Operator License Case

180 A.2d 100, 197 Pa. Super. 596, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 888
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 12, 1962
DocketAppeal, No. 244
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 180 A.2d 100 (Hogan Motor Vehicle Operator License Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogan Motor Vehicle Operator License Case, 180 A.2d 100, 197 Pa. Super. 596, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 888 (Pa. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This appeal is from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County sustaining a suspension imposed by the Secretary of Revenue.

The suspension was based on §618(e) of The Vehicle Code of 1959, P. L. 58, 75 P.S. §618, which provides that, “The secretary is hereby authorized ... to suspend the operator’s license ... of any person licensed in this commonwealth, upon receiving notice of the conviction of such person in another state of an offense therein which, if committed in this commonwealth, would be grounds for the suspension or revocation of the license of an operator.”

[598]*598On. April 5, 1960, the appellant was charged with traveling 66 miles per hour in a 50 mile per hour zone in Mansfield Township, New Jersey. On or about April 18, 1960, he voluntarily paid the fine for that charge. The secretary received notice of this conviction on May 3, 1960, and after holding a hearing, suspended the appellant’s license for a period of one month.

The only question raised on this appeal is the sufficiency of the notice of conviction sent by the State of New Jersey. Although the notice ivas lost after the hearing in the court below, an examination of the record of that hearing convinces us that the notice of conviction was sufficient. The notice had on it the fact that appellant was arrested, that he paid a fine of $15 and that the date of conviction was 4/16/60. This notice meets the standards of sufficiency that we established in similar cases. See Commonwealth v. Halteman, 192 Pa. Superior Ct. 379, 162 A. 2d 251 (1960); Witsch Motor Vehicle Operator License Case, 194 Pa, Superior Ct. 384, 168 A. 2d 772 (1961).

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Iorio
276 A.2d 360 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Shaw v. Department of Public Safety
131 N.W.2d 261 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1964)
Gassoway Motor Vehicle Operator License Case
185 A.2d 671 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 A.2d 100, 197 Pa. Super. 596, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-motor-vehicle-operator-license-case-pasuperct-1962.