Hofstetter v. Hofstetter

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hofstetter v. Hofstetter

266 S.W.3d 330, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1404, 2008 WL 4553067

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 14, 2008·No. ED 90586·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clayton Hofstetter (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Erin Hofstetter’s (“Mother”) motion to modify child support and ordering him to pay a portion of Mother’s attorney fees. We find that the trial court did not err in increasing the amount of child support Father is obligated to pay Mother from $150.00 per week to $185.00 per week. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Father to pay $1,600.00 of Mother’s attorney’s fees.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum set *331 ting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clayton Hofstetter (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Erin Hofstetter’s (“Mother”) motion to modify child support and ordering him to pay a portion of Mother’s attorney fees. We find that the trial court did not err in increasing the amount of child support Father is obligated to pay Mother from $150.00 per week to $185.00 per week. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Father to pay $1,600.00 of Mother’s attorney’s fees.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum set *331 ting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Hofstetter v. Hofstetter, 266 S.W.3d 330, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1404, 2008 WL 4553067 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

266 S.W.3d 330 (Hofstetter v. Hofstetter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.