Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hofstadter v. Bienstock

Hofstadter v. Bienstock

213 A.D. 807
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 213 A.D. 807 (Hofstadter v. Bienstock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hofstadter v. Bienstock, 213 A.D. 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinions

Per Curiam:

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent, upon the authority of the majority opinion in Villemin v. Brown (193 App. Div. 777). The complaint in the ease at bar does not allege that the alleged slanderous word was applied to the plaintiff in his profession. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Burr, JJ.; Dowling, J., dissents in memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. National Broadcasting Co.
24 A.D.2d 284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Dietrich v. Hauser
45 Misc. 2d 805 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Bruno v. Schukart
12 Misc. 2d 383 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Mishkin v. Roreck
202 Misc. 653 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Lendino v. Fiorenza
203 Misc. 115 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Weiner v. Leviton
230 A.D. 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D. 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hofstadter-v-bienstock-nyappdiv-1925.