Hofmann v. Kupfer

285 A.D. 810, 137 N.Y.S.2d 621

This text of 285 A.D. 810 (Hofmann v. Kupfer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hofmann v. Kupfer, 285 A.D. 810, 137 N.Y.S.2d 621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment modified to the extent of eliminating finding of fact numbered 36 ” and conclusion of law numbered “ 13 ” and, as so modified, the interlocutory judgment is affirmed. We think the finding and conclusion indicated are premature and any such finding and conclusion should await the completion of the accounting. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ. [See post, p. 943.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 A.D. 810, 137 N.Y.S.2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hofmann-v-kupfer-nyappdiv-1955.