Hofmann v. Kupfer
This text of 285 A.D. 810 (Hofmann v. Kupfer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment modified to the extent of eliminating finding of fact numbered “ 36 ” and conclusion of law numbered “ 13 ” and, as so modified, the interlocutory judgment is affirmed. We think the finding and conclusion indicated are premature and any such finding and conclusion should await the completion of the accounting. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ. [See post, p. 943.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 810, 137 N.Y.S.2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hofmann-v-kupfer-nyappdiv-1955.