Hofland v. York County Jail
This text of Hofland v. York County Jail (Hofland v. York County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION YORK, ss. DOCKET NO. CV-08-35,3 f ' ~:. -- / ,~.-: 1
RANDALL HOFLAND,
Plaintiff
v. ORDER
YORK COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
Defendants
Mr. Randall Hofland is currently held at the York County jail awaiting trial on
charges from Waldo County. In December of 2008 he filed a petition for writ of
mandamus and injunctive relief based on his belief that jail officials had interfered with
his constitutional rights to read local newspapers and to have access to the evening
television news programs. Since then more than a dozen motions have been filed
including motions, which if granted, would expand the scope of this suit.
I can find no bases for the Court to become involved, on constitutional grounds,
in detailed questions concerning what newspapers are available, or when and what
television programming is made available. Those details, if they are to be regulated by
anyone other than jail officials, must come from the legislature or by regulation.
The Law Court noted in Department of Corrections v. Superior Court, 622 A.2d 1131,
4 (Me. 1993), "The courts of this state always have the power and duty to uphold the
State and Federal Constitutions." However, the court stated, at 1135, that "We do not
denigrate the oath that all judges take to uphold both Constitutions, but that oath does
not confer a roving commission to seek out and correct violations." Here there is no constitutional violation and it is not the job of the judicial branch of government to
interfere in decisions regarding the minute details of inmate access to newspapers or
television news.
The initial petition will be dismissed with prejudice. This decision does not
resolve any other claims that Mr. Hofland was attempting to raise through his various
evolving motions.
The entry is:
Petition for writ of mandamus and injunctive relief is dismissed with prejudice.
All other motions are dismissed as moot.
As separately ordered from the bench, counsel for York County shall inform the Court and Mr. Hofland in writing of the whereabouts of his various files and legal papers.
Dated: July 28,2009
pau~~:'e~ Justice, Superior Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hofland v. York County Jail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hofland-v-york-county-jail-mesuperct-2009.