Hofland v. York County Jail

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 28, 2009
DocketYORcv-08-353
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hofland v. York County Jail (Hofland v. York County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hofland v. York County Jail, (Me. Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION YORK, ss. DOCKET NO. CV-08-35,3 f ' ~:. -- / ,~.-: 1

RANDALL HOFLAND,

Plaintiff

v. ORDER

YORK COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants

Mr. Randall Hofland is currently held at the York County jail awaiting trial on

charges from Waldo County. In December of 2008 he filed a petition for writ of

mandamus and injunctive relief based on his belief that jail officials had interfered with

his constitutional rights to read local newspapers and to have access to the evening

television news programs. Since then more than a dozen motions have been filed

including motions, which if granted, would expand the scope of this suit.

I can find no bases for the Court to become involved, on constitutional grounds,

in detailed questions concerning what newspapers are available, or when and what

television programming is made available. Those details, if they are to be regulated by

anyone other than jail officials, must come from the legislature or by regulation.

The Law Court noted in Department of Corrections v. Superior Court, 622 A.2d 1131,

4 (Me. 1993), "The courts of this state always have the power and duty to uphold the

State and Federal Constitutions." However, the court stated, at 1135, that "We do not

denigrate the oath that all judges take to uphold both Constitutions, but that oath does

not confer a roving commission to seek out and correct violations." Here there is no constitutional violation and it is not the job of the judicial branch of government to

interfere in decisions regarding the minute details of inmate access to newspapers or

television news.

The initial petition will be dismissed with prejudice. This decision does not

resolve any other claims that Mr. Hofland was attempting to raise through his various

evolving motions.

The entry is:

Petition for writ of mandamus and injunctive relief is dismissed with prejudice.

All other motions are dismissed as moot.

As separately ordered from the bench, counsel for York County shall inform the Court and Mr. Hofland in writing of the whereabouts of his various files and legal papers.

Dated: July 28,2009

pau~~:'e~ Justice, Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Corrections v. Superior Court
622 A.2d 1131 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hofland v. York County Jail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hofland-v-york-county-jail-mesuperct-2009.