Hofheinz v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hofheinz v. Wilson

278 S.W. 224

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 25, 1925

DocketNo. 6117.

StatusPublished

This text of 278 S.W. 224 (Hofheinz v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hofheinz v. Wilson, 278 S.W. 224 (Tex. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

McCLENDON, C. J.

Motion to affirm on certificate. Notice of appeal given, but the record presented does not show by certificate of tbe clerk or otherwise that appeal bond was filed or that tbe appeal was otherwise perfected. Tbis court is therefore without jurisdiction to affirm on certificate. R. S. 1925, art. 1841; Supreme Council v. Anderson, 36 Tex. Civ. App. 615, 83 S. W. 207; Brightman v. Brightman (Tex. Civ. App.) 166 S. W. 415.

Tbe motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCLENDON, C. J.

Motion to affirm on certificate. Notice of appeal given, but the record presented does not show by certificate of tbe clerk or otherwise that appeal bond was filed or that tbe appeal was otherwise perfected. Tbis court is therefore without jurisdiction to affirm on certificate. R. S. 1925, art. 1841; Supreme Council v. Anderson, 36 Tex. Civ. App. 615, 83 S. W. 207; Brightman v. Brightman (Tex. Civ. App.) 166 S. W. 415.

Tbe motion is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 S.W. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hofheinz-v-wilson-texapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack