Hoffpauir, Ex Parte Kenneth Author
This text of Hoffpauir, Ex Parte Kenneth Author (Hoffpauir, Ex Parte Kenneth Author) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FROM CAUSE NO. 85281-A FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
Per curiam.This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3, et seq. Applicant pleaded guilty to the felony offense of indecency with a child, and punishment, enhanced to the habitual offender level, was assessed at thirty years' confinement. Applicant's direct appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Hoffpauir v. State, No. 09-03-050-CR (Tex. App. - Beaumont, delivered March 6, 2003, no pet.).
Applicant contends, inter alia, that his plea of no contest was not entered knowingly and voluntarily, because counsel advised him that he was pleading to a "non-aggravated" or "non-3G" offense, when in fact the judgment reflects that the conviction was under Article 21.11, Section (a)(1) of the Texas Penal Code, which is listed in Section 3G of Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that Applicant be granted relief insofar as the judgment should be reformed to reflect the non-3G offense. We agree. The plea papers in this cause do not indicate that Applicant pleaded no contest to indecency with a child under Article 21.11, Section (a)(1).
Habeas corpus relief is granted and the judgment in cause number 85281-A from the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County is ordered reformed to reflect a conviction under Article 21.11, Section (a)(2). Copies of this opinion and of the reformed judgment shall be delivered to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Applicant's remaining claims are without merit, and are denied.
DO NOT PUBLISH
DELIVERED: March 8, 2006
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hoffpauir, Ex Parte Kenneth Author, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffpauir-ex-parte-kenneth-author-texcrimapp-2006.