Hoffnagle v. Leavitt

7 Cow. 517
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The amendment sought, is within the principle of several cases decided by this court; and it should be granted. But that must be without prejudice to the defendant. He and his counsel were, in fact, misled, so as not fully to prepare the defense; and this by the omission of the plaintiff. We, therefore, direct the amendment; but it must be on the condition that the plaintiff consent to a new trial, within 80 days. If he withholds such consent, the case must proceed to argument, with the variance upon it.

Buie accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffnagle v. Leavitt, 7 Cow. 517 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

7 Cow. 517 (Hoffnagle v. Leavitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Smith
14 How. Pr. 187 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Bogart v. M'Donald
2 Johns. Cas. 219 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)