Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister

264 A.D. 724, 34 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 724 (Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister, 264 A.D. 724, 34 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order denying appellant’s cross-motion for principal custody of his child, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term for hearing and determination of the issue as to whether the removal of the child to the residence of his maternal grandmother is [725]*725such a changed condition as to warrant the modification of the order of June 13, 1941. However, proof of the acts and conduct of the persons involved which may affect the moral and temporal welfare of the child should be limited to those occurring since June 13, 1941. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order denying appellant’s cross-motion for principal custody of his child, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term for hearing and determination of the issue as to whether the removal of the child to the residence of his maternal grandmother is [725]*725such a changed condition as to warrant the modification of the order of June 13, 1941. However, proof of the acts and conduct of the persons involved which may affect the moral and temporal welfare of the child should be limited to those occurring since June 13, 1941. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 724, 34 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffmeister-v-hoffmeister-nyappdiv-1942.