Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister

264 A.D. 724, 34 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 6, 1942·Published

Opinion

— Order denying appellant’s cross-motion for principal custody of his child, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term for hearing and determination of the issue as to whether the removal of the child to the residence of his maternal grandmother is [725]*725such a changed condition as to warrant the modification of the order of June 13, 1941. However, proof of the acts and conduct of the persons involved which may affect the moral and temporal welfare of the child should be limited to those occurring since June 13, 1941. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order denying appellant’s cross-motion for principal custody of his child, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term for hearing and determination of the issue as to whether the removal of the child to the residence of his maternal grandmother is [725]*725such a changed condition as to warrant the modification of the order of June 13, 1941. However, proof of the acts and conduct of the persons involved which may affect the moral and temporal welfare of the child should be limited to those occurring since June 13, 1941. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister, 264 A.D. 724, 34 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 724 (Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.