Hoffmeier v. Trost

92 A. 277, 86 N.J.L. 682, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 311
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoffmeier v. Trost. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 N.J.L. 358
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 16, 1914·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Vrehenburgu, Williams, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chief Juslice, Swayze, Parker, Bo-GERT, HePPENHEIMER, JJ. 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffmeier v. Trost, 92 A. 277, 86 N.J.L. 682, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 311 (N.J. 1914).

92 A. 277 (Hoffmeier v. Trost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.