Hoffmeier v. Trost

92 A. 277, 86 N.J.L. 682, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 311
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 16, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 92 A. 277 (Hoffmeier v. Trost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoffmeier v. Trost, 92 A. 277, 86 N.J.L. 682, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 311 (N.J. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Vrehenburgu, Williams, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chief Juslice, Swayze, Parker, Bo-GERT, HePPENHEIMER, JJ. 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A. 277, 86 N.J.L. 682, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffmeier-v-trost-nj-1914.