Hoffman v. Weir

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 24, 2005
Docket05-6313
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hoffman v. Weir (Hoffman v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoffman v. Weir, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6313

SIDNEY N. HOFFMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRIAN WEIR, Officer, Gaston County Sheriff Detention Office; R. COBB, Sergeant, Gaston County Jail; RHONDA NEESE, R.N., Gaston County Jail-Medical; L. MARSH, Gaston County Jail-Medical; MECKLENBURG COUNTY SHERIFF'S DETENTION OFFICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-497)

Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 24, 2005

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sidney N. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Sidney N. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Hoffman v. Weir, No. CA-04-497 (W.D.N.C. Filed Feb. 2, 2005 &

entered Feb. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hoffman v. Weir, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-weir-ca4-2005.