Hoffman v. Wadsworth

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 2002
Docket02-6646
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hoffman v. Wadsworth (Hoffman v. Wadsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoffman v. Wadsworth, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6646

CLIVE HOFFMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DERRICK WADSWORTH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-851-5-BR)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 19, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clive Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Clive Hoffman appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Hoffman v. Wadsworth, No. CA-01-851-5-BR

(E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hoffman v. Wadsworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-wadsworth-ca4-2002.