Hoffman v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Hoffman v. Superior Court

196 Cal. 278

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 17, 1925

DocketS. F. No. 11652

StatusPublished

This text of 196 Cal. 278 (Hoffman v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoffman v. Superior Court, 196 Cal. 278 (Cal. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This COURT COURT. a petition for a writ of mandate

to compel the respondents to enter an order substituting petitioner, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of J. Charles King, a bankrupt, in place of said King as defendant, in an action now pending in the respondent [279]*279court. No showing is presented from which it appears to us that a plain, speedy and adequate remedy (Code Civ. Proc.,- sec. 1086) is not available to petitioner in the premises by intervention. (Code Civ. Proc., see. 387.),

The petition is denied.

Petition for modification of opinion denied.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This COURT COURT. a petition for a writ of mandate

to compel the respondents to enter an order substituting petitioner, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of J. Charles King, a bankrupt, in place of said King as defendant, in an action now pending in the respondent [279]*279court. No showing is presented from which it appears to us that a plain, speedy and adequate remedy (Code Civ. Proc.,- sec. 1086) is not available to petitioner in the premises by intervention. (Code Civ. Proc., see. 387.),

The petition is denied.

Petition for modification of opinion denied.

All the Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 Cal. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-superior-court-cal-1925.