Hoffman v. State
820 So. 2d 1032, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9422, 2002 WL 1431610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoffman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14610 →
Opinion
Affirmed, without prejudice as outlined in the trial court’s order. When addressing the merits, the trial court is to consider Martin v. State, 796 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), rev. denied, 816 So.2d 127 (Fla.2002) and Kronz v. State, 462 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla.1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. State, 820 So. 2d 1032, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9422, 2002 WL 1431610 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
820 So. 2d 1032 (Hoffman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kronz v. State
462 So. 2d 450 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Martin v. State
796 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)