Hoffman v. State

550 So. 2d 148, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2441, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6298, 1989 WL 124997
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1989·No. No. 89-02155·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Hoffman appeals the denial by the trial court of his motion and amended motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm.

Hoffman alleges that the sentencing guidelines were improperly applied to his offenses, and that the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction over one-third of his sentence. Both arguments are without merit. A review of the record clearly reflects that the crimes for which Hoffman was sentenced were committed before July 1, 1984, the effective date of the sentencing guidelines, as recently determined by the supreme court in Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989).* Therefore, even though Hoffman was sentenced after July 1, 1984, he must affirmatively elect to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines in order that the guidelines apply to his sentence. See § 921.001(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983); Smith, 537 So.2d at 987; In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing Guidelines), 439 So.2d 848 (Fla.1983).

Hoffman did not elect to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines. The record reflects that this sentence was imposed based upon a plea bargain in which Hoffman participated. Therefore, the judge imposing the sentence was not required to adhere to the sentencing guidelines. The trial court so found in denying the motion and amended motion to correct an illegal sentence.

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffman v. State, 550 So. 2d 148, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2441, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6298, 1989 WL 124997 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 148 (Hoffman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
537 So. 2d 982 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Wahl v. State
543 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
In re Rules of Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 848 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)