Hoffman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 7, 2024·No. 19-0111V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

********************** DUANE HOFFMAN, * * No. 19-111V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * * Filed: September 13, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * **********************

Isaiah Kalinowski, Bosson Legal Group, P.C., Fairfax, VA, for petitioner; Felicia D. Langel, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING FINDING ENTITLEMENT TO COMPENSATION 1

Duane Hoffman alleges that an influenza (“flu”) vaccine caused him to develop a neurologic problem, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”). Mr. Hoffman supported his claim with reports from a neurologist retained for this litigation, Zurab Nadareishvili. The Secretary disputes Mr. Hoffman’s claim that the flu vaccine injured him and has, likewise, supported

1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted on the website. 1 his position with reports from a neurologist the Secretary retained for this litigation, Michael Wilson.

An Initial Entitlement Decision rejected Mr. Hoffman’s argument that he was required to present a plausible theory of how the flu vaccine can cause CIDP. Initial Entitlement Decision, issued Jan. 10, 2024, 2024 WL 402731. Mr. Hoffman contested this determination. Pet’r’s Mot. for Rev., filed Feb. 9, 2024. The Court agreed that the Initial Entitlement Decision erroneously elevated Mr. Hoffman’s burden of proof. Opinion and Order, issued July 8, 2024, 2024 WL 3688477. The Court remanded for further adjudication. Upon remand, the parties filed supplemental briefs. An oral argument with the undersigned was held on August 16, 2024.2 A review of the evidence under the Court’s standards shows that Mr. Hoffman is entitled to compensation. I. Background3

Mr. Hoffman was born in 1960. For many years, he worked as a corrections officer, although he was not employed when he received the allegedly causal flu vaccination in 2017. Exhibit 23 (affidavit regarding damages).

More than two years before the flu vaccination, Mr. Hoffman was diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (“CLL”). Exhibit 10 at 7 (Mar. 31. 2015). The Secretary’s expert, Dr. Wilson, has proposed that the leukemia is associated with an increased risk for CIDP. Exhibit A at 5.

In January 2017, Mr. Hoffman was hospitalized due to an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Exhibit 4 at 657. While hospitalized, Mr. Hoffman received the flu vaccine. Exhibit 1. (Mr. Hoffman also received a pneumococcal vaccine but his claim rests upon the flu vaccine.)

2 As part of the motion for review, the Court heard oral argument. The transcript from June 20, 2024 contains pages 1-86. The transcript from the August 16, 2024 argument contains pages 101-199. 3 Events in Mr. Hoffman’s life were summarized in the Initial Entitlement Decision and largely adopted in the Court’s Opinion and Order. The parties were satisfied with the recitation of events. Tr. 111.

2 Mr. Hoffman was diagnosed with low back pain on January 24, 2017. Exhibit 4 at 819, 862. This pain continued and Mr. Hoffman developed other problems for which he was admitted to Riverside Methodist Hospital. In Riverside Methodist Hospital, Mr. Hoffman underwent tests, including an EMG/NCS. Based upon the results, Mr. Hoffman’s doctors diagnosed him with a neurologic disorder, Guillain-Barré syndrome. Exhibit 7 at 261, 876-81.

Guillain-Barré syndrome is:

(i) … an acute monophasic peripheral neuropathy that encompasses a spectrum of four clinicopathological subtypes described below. For each subtype of GBS, the interval between the first appearance of symptoms and the nadir of weakness is between 12 hours and 28 days. This is followed in all subtypes by a clinical plateau with stabilization at the nadir of symptoms, or subsequent improvement without significant relapse. Death may occur without a clinical plateau. Treatment related fluctuations in all subtypes of GBS can occur within 9 weeks of GBS symptom onset and recurrence of symptoms after this time-frame would not be consistent with GBS.

(ii) The most common subtype in North America and Europe, comprising more than 90 percent of cases, is acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), which has the pathologic and electrodiagnostic features of focal demyelination of motor and sensory peripheral nerves and nerve roots. . . . AIDP [is] typically characterized by symmetric motor flaccid weakness, sensory abnormalities, and/or autonomic dysfunction caused by autoimmune damage to peripheral nerves and nerve roots. The diagnosis of AIDP. . . requires:

(A) Bilateral flaccid limb weakness and decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes in weak limbs; (B) A monophasic illness pattern; (C) An interval between onset and nadir of weakness between 12 hours and 28 days; (D) Subsequent clinical plateau (the clinical plateau leads to either stabilization at the nadir of symptoms, or subsequent improvement without significant relapse; however, death may occur without a clinical plateau); and,

3 (E) The absence of an identified more likely alternative diagnosis.

*** (v) To qualify as any subtype of GBS, there must not be a more likely alternative diagnosis for the weakness. (vi) Exclusionary criteria for the diagnosis of all subtypes of GBS include the ultimate diagnosis of any of the following conditions: chronic immune demyelinating polyradiculopathy (CIDP) . . .

42 C.F.R. § 100.3(c)(15).

Mr. Hoffman’s doctors prescribed a standard treatment for GBS, the infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin (“IVIG”). In early 2017, when Mr. Hoffman’s doctors were treating him for GBS, at least one doctor stated that the flu vaccine caused Mr. Hoffman’s GBS. Exhibit 7 at 266; see also Exhibit 4 at 1053 (note, from an unknown source, that Mr. Hoffman’s allergies include the flu vaccine).

Mr. Hoffman attempted rehabilitation for several months and sought care from various doctors. One neurologist, Geoffrey Eubank, ordered a test for anti- ganglioside antibodies. The results were negative. Exhibit 9 at 32. Approximately eight months after the diagnosis of GBS, Mr. Hoffman saw Dr. Eubank again. Exhibit 19 at 66 (Oct. 9, 2017). Dr. Eubank changed the diagnosis to CIDP. He explained his rationale. Dr. Eubank

previously thought that [Mr. Hoffman] had Guillain Barre syndrome but . . . [h]e continued to have some worsening this summer and subsequently improved with a course of IVIG for 5 days. This would not be typical for Guillain Barre which should be more of a monophasic illness.

Id.

Another neurologist, Timothy Rust, confirmed the diagnosis of CIDP. Exhibit 19 at 58 (Dec. 13, 2017). Dr. Rust wrote that “CLL can be associated with peripheral nervous system pathology similar to non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including a relatively high rate of CIDP.” Id. 4 The diagnosis of CIDP is accepted by the neurologists retained to provide opinions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Hoffman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Hoffman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related