Hoffman v. Screen Actors Guild Producers Pension Plan
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LESLIE HOFFMAN, Case No.: 2:16-CV-01530-CJC-E
Plaintiff, Hon. Judge Cormac J. Carney
v. JUDGMENT
PRODUCERS PENSION PLAN, an ERISA plan; BOARD OF TRUSTEES SCREEN ACTORS GUILD- PRODUCERS PENSION PLAN, a plan administrator; DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff Leslie Hoffman (‘Plaintiff’) is hereby awarded judgment on her claims for relief against Defendants Screen Actors Guild — Producers’ Pension Plan (the \“Plan’) and Board of Trustees (collectively “Defendants”), as follows: 1. This matter is remanded back to Defendants for a further review of their termination of Plaintiff's benefits. 2. Defendants shall pay Plaintiff $54,516.67 in allegedly past-due benefits, g ||pursuant to Pannebecker v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston, 542 F. 3d 1213 (9 2008). 3. Any motion for attorneys’ fees shall be filed within 14 days of the entry /of this judgment. Dated: February 5, 2020 Lo ( Hon. Cormac J. Carne United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. Screen Actors Guild Producers Pension Plan (Hoffman v. Screen Actors Guild Producers Pension Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.