Hoffman v. Rattner
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ae Se □ Se es A □□ Re Be ee Bak ae GABRIELLE HOFFMAN, et ano. Plaintiffs,
-against- 20-cv-8839 (LAK) BRETT RATTNER, Defendant. Te mm eR ee eee ee ee eee HX
ORDER
LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allegethe citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Absent the filing, on or before November 6, 2020, of an amended complaint adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be dismissed (or remanded). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2020
isfA. 1 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. Rattner (Hoffman v. Rattner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.