Hoffman v. Rattner

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 28, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-08839·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ae Se □ Se es A □□ Re Be ee Bak ae GABRIELLE HOFFMAN, et ano. Plaintiffs,

-against- 20-cv-8839 (LAK) BRETT RATTNER, Defendant. Te mm eR ee eee ee ee eee HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allegethe citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Absent the filing, on or before November 6, 2020, of an amended complaint adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be dismissed (or remanded). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2020

isfA. 1 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffman v. Rattner, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Hoffman v. Rattner (Hoffman v. Rattner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related