Hoffman v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoffman v. Rabinowitz

13 A.D.2d 703, 215 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 703 (Hoffman v. Rabinowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoffman v. Rabinowitz, 13 A.D.2d 703, 215 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

—-In an action pursuant to the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (§5, [704]*704subd. 6; L. 1959, eh. 695) and the State Rent and Eviction Regulations (§ 71, subd. 4) issued thereunder to recover damages and attorney’s fees, on the ground that defendant has failed to use premises for the purpose for which eviction was sought and granted, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated December 8, 1960, denying their motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—-In an action pursuant to the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (§5, [704]*704subd. 6; L. 1959, eh. 695) and the State Rent and Eviction Regulations (§ 71, subd. 4) issued thereunder to recover damages and attorney’s fees, on the ground that defendant has failed to use premises for the purpose for which eviction was sought and granted, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated December 8, 1960, denying their motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 703, 215 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-rabinowitz-nyappdiv-1961.