Hoffman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

93 A. 821, 248 Pa. 62, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 511
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 18, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 221
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 A. 821 (Hoffman v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoffman v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 93 A. 821, 248 Pa. 62, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 511 (Pa. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below very properly refused to take off the [63]*63judgment of nonsuit which, was entered in this case. The boy who was injured was clearly a trespasser upon the tracks of the defendant company, at a place, where the difficulty in getting upon them, from the direction in which the boy approached, was very great. It appears from the record, that in order to accomplish his purpose, the boy climbed more than thirty feet up the steplike end of a stone abutment, and then apparently stepped around the end of an iron fence, walked along one track, over a trestle and between iron girders, and then while in the act of crossing ánother track, was struck by an approaching train. There was no warrant or excuse for the action of the boy, in coming upon the tracks in this way. There is not the slightest intimation in the testimony, that the injury was the result of wilful or wanton conduct upon the part of any employee of the defendant company.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horen v. Davis
118 A. 22 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A. 821, 248 Pa. 62, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-pennsylvania-railroad-pa-1915.