Hoffman v. Oesterreicher

Fourth Circuit

Hoffman v. Oesterreicher

42 F. App'x 585

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2002·No. No. 02-1280·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arlene J. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoffman v. Oesterreicher, No. CA-01-1532 A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 7, 2002 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arlene J. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoffman v. Oesterreicher, No. CA-01-1532 A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 7, 2002 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hoffman v. Oesterreicher, 42 F. App'x 585 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 585 (Hoffman v. Oesterreicher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.