Hoffman v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
75 N.Y. 605, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 914
Opinion
reads for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.
Church, Ch. J., Raparlo and Miller, JJ., concur; Earl and Hand, JJ., dissent; Andrews, J., absent.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 75 N.Y. 605, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 914 (N.Y. 1878).
75 N.Y. 605 (Hoffman v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kovarik v. Long Island Railroad
189 A.D. 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Lincoln
223 F. 896 (Second Circuit, 1915)
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Jandera
1909 OK 141 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
McCormick v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
104 N.W. 390 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
People v. Beaman
92 N.Y.S. 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Percey v. Fitchburg Railroad
27 N.Y.S. 1040 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Skottowe v. Oregon Short Line, Ry. Co.
16 L.R.A. 593 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1892)
Boyce v. . Manhattan Railway Co.
23 N.E. 304 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Wallace v. Wilmington & N. R.
18 A. 818 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1889)
Cross v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
37 N.W. 361 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1888)
Van Ostran v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 590 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)