Hoffman v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoffman v. Murphy

68 A.D.2d 933

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.2d 933 (Hoffman v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoffman v. Murphy, 68 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover on the theory of quantum meruit, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 6, 1978, as denied his motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Since there is to be a trial on the issues arising from the counterclaims, there was no necessity to consider the granting of [934]*934summary judgment on the complaint, even if otherwise warranted. Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Martuscello and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on the theory of quantum meruit, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 6, 1978, as denied his motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Since there is to be a trial on the issues arising from the counterclaims, there was no necessity to consider the granting of [934]*934summary judgment on the complaint, even if otherwise warranted. Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Martuscello and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.2d 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1979.