Hoffman v. Kew Gardens Hills Associates
This text of 187 A.D.2d 379 (Hoffman v. Kew Gardens Hills Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered December 31, 1991, which granted third-party defendants’ motion to sever the third-party action from the main action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Severance of the third-party action against third-party defendants, an insurance broker and his agency, for negligence and malpractice resulting from the insolvency of the first of two excess carriers was proper as a joint trial would result in substantial prejudice (see, Kelly v Yannotti, 4 NY2d 603, 607). The severing of negligence actions from insurance coverage actions applies to brokers and agents as well as to insurance companies (see, Johnson v Berger, 171 AD2d 728). Although the motion was brought pursuant to CPLR 1010, the court did not err in basing its finding not only upon substantial prejudice, but also on the lack of a common question of law or fact under CPLR article 6 which is also pertinent to the propriety of a single trial for a main and third-party action (see, 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶¶ 603.14, 1010.05). Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Ross, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 A.D.2d 379, 590 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-kew-gardens-hills-associates-nyappdiv-1992.