Hoffman v. Johnstown & Somerset Railway Co.
163 A. 513, 309 Pa. 183, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 679
Opinion
Our general rule is that on appeals from granting preliminary injunctions by the lower court, we will not interfere except in cases entirely free from doubt: Lesher v. Gassner Co., 285 Pa. 43; Commonwealth v. Katz, 281 Pa. 287. We are not convinced that this is *184 such a case, and consequently will dismiss the appeal, without considering at length the merits of the controversy involved; these may appear quite differently when the case is fully developed upon hearing.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. Johnstown & Somerset Railway Co., 163 A. 513, 309 Pa. 183, 1932 Pa. LEXIS 679 (Pa. 1932).
163 A. 513 (Hoffman v. Johnstown & Somerset Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yale Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Knitgoods Workers Union Local 190
5 A.2d 323 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Salus v. Lawrence, SEC. of Com.
3 A.2d 696 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Harrisburg Dairies, Inc. v. Eisaman
195 A. 337 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)