Hoffman v. Howell

88 A. 877, 242 Pa. 112, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 847
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 27, 1913
DocketAppeal, No. 177
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 88 A. 877 (Hoffman v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoffman v. Howell, 88 A. 877, 242 Pa. 112, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 847 (Pa. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order dissolving a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant from drilling oil [114]*114or gas wells on his own land. The injunction was granted on averments in the bill and injunction affidavit, some of which were not supported by proof at the hearing and others give rise to questions that cannot be properly considered until after final hearing and decree. Our established practice on appeals from the awarding or refusing of preliminary injunctions is not to consider the merits of the case, but only to determine whether under the facts presented in the Common Pleas there was reasonable ground for the action of the court.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanton v. Paul
162 A.2d 197 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. Flynn
161 A.2d 364 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Rubin v. Bailey
157 A.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Aldrich v. Geahry
61 A.2d 843 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Salus v. Lawrence, SEC. of Com.
3 A.2d 696 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Philadelphia Record Co. v. Curtis-Martin Newspapers, Inc.
157 A. 796 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Howard v. Goodnough
141 A. 483 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Lesher v. Thomas S. Gassner Co.
131 A. 657 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Stefanich v. Beaver Falls
77 Pa. Super. 125 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Davis v. Porch Bros.
112 A. 32 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Brock v. Atlantic Refining Co.
111 A. 47 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
City Ice Co. v. Easton Merchants' Ice Co.
108 A. 593 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Beetem v. Carlisle Light, Heat & Power Co.
108 A. 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Holden v. Llewellyn
105 A. 639 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A. 877, 242 Pa. 112, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-howell-pa-1913.