Hoffman v. Hoffman
35 How. Pr. 384
Opinion
This was an action fór a limited divorce, which has been pending for some months. The plaintiff now moved, upon voluminous papers, for leave to file a supplemental complaint, alleging adultery, and praying an absolute divorce.
The court denied the motion, on the ground that the causes of action were incompatible, and that the complaint, • if allowed, would be demurrable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. Hoffman, 35 How. Pr. 384 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1864).
35 How. Pr. 384 (Hoffman v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gaylord v. Beardsley
19 N.Y.S. 548 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)