Hoffman v. Hoffman
This text of 201 So. 2d 262 (Hoffman v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, Natalie R. Hoffman, appeals from a final decree of divorce granting plaintiff a divorce and ordering the defendant, Donald A. Hoffman, to pay alimony and support, contending that the award is insufficient.
There is substantial competent evidence in the transcript of testimony to support the award and we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied.
The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs, and oral argument of counsel, and from such consideration, no reversible error is found.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 So. 2d 262, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-hoffman-fladistctapp-1967.