Hoffman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoffman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

260 A.D. 936, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5535

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 936 (Hoffman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoffman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 260 A.D. 936, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for injuries sustained by reason of defendant Brady’s alleged negligence in the operation of his truck, and by her father for loss of services and medical expenses, order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent Brady, with leave to the plaintiffs, however, to renew the motion upon a case duly settled as provided in Civil Practice Rule 221. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for injuries sustained by reason of defendant Brady’s alleged negligence in the operation of his truck, and by her father for loss of services and medical expenses, order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent Brady, with leave to the plaintiffs, however, to renew the motion upon a case duly settled as provided in Civil Practice Rule 221. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 936, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1940.