Hoffman v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoffman v. Goldstein

12 A.D.2d 492, 209 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7200

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 492 (Hoffman v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoffman v. Goldstein, 12 A.D.2d 492, 209 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, an order was made by the Special Term, Supreme Court, Kings County, on September 29, 1959, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, and a judgment was accordingly entered on December 14, 1959, in favor of defend[493]*493ants. Thereafter, plaintiff made a motion, on new papers, “ to renew ” the said motion to dismiss. The Special Term considered the motion as one for reargument, and made an order, dated January 4, 1960, which grants reargument and, upon reargument, denies defendants’ original motion to dismiss and vacates the order of September 29, 1959 and the judgment. The defendants appeal from the order of January 4, 1960. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, an order was made by the Special Term, Supreme Court, Kings County, on September 29, 1959, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, and a judgment was accordingly entered on December 14, 1959, in favor of defend[493]*493ants. Thereafter, plaintiff made a motion, on new papers, “ to renew ” the said motion to dismiss. The Special Term considered the motion as one for reargument, and made an order, dated January 4, 1960, which grants reargument and, upon reargument, denies defendants’ original motion to dismiss and vacates the order of September 29, 1959 and the judgment. The defendants appeal from the order of January 4, 1960. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 492, 209 N.Y.S.2d 772, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-goldstein-nyappdiv-1960.