Hoffman v. Dunlop
1 Barb. 185
Opinion
The release pleaded does not fall within the provisions of the act of 1838. It must be construed with reference to the common law; and viewed in that light, it is a discharge of all the defendants.
Judgment for the defendants on the demurrer; with leave to the plaintiff to reply on payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. Dunlop, 1 Barb. 185 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).
1 Barb. 185 (Hoffman v. Dunlop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walsh v. Miller
51 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1894)
Holdridge v. Farmers & Mechanics Bank
16 Mich. 66 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1867)
Matthews v. Chicopee Manufacturing Co.
3 Rob. 711 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1865)