Hoffman v. Duel
5 Johns. 232
Opinion
The established rule of construction, in-all cases of this kind, is, that one day is inclusive and the other exclusive. If you include the 1st day of September, then the defendant had all the twenty-first day in which to plead. Take your rule, with costs.
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoffman v. Duel, 5 Johns. 232 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
5 Johns. 232 (Hoffman v. Duel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of Com'rs of Delaware County v. Briggs
340 N.E.2d 373 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1976)
On Petition for Rehearing
167 Ind. App. 137 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1976)
Aultman Taylor Co. v. . Syme
57 N.E. 168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Bemis v. Leonard
118 Mass. 502 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)
Walsh v. Boyle
30 Md. 262 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1869)
Teucher & English v. Hiatt
23 Iowa 527 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1868)
Temple v. Carstens
1 Greene 492 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1848)
Snyder v. Warren
2 Cow. 518 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)
Blunt v. Greenwood
1 Cow. 15 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)