Hoffman v. Chester

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hoffman v. Chester

49 S.E.2d 771, 204 Ga. 311, 1948 Ga. LEXIS 421

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1948

Docket16323.

StatusPublished

This text of 49 S.E.2d 771 (Hoffman v. Chester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoffman v. Chester, 49 S.E.2d 771, 204 Ga. 311, 1948 Ga. LEXIS 421 (Ga. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Wyatt, Justice.

This court having held that the trial court erred in over- ■ ruling a general demurrer to the petition (Hoffman v. Chester, ante), it follows that subsequent proceedings, including the allowance of an intervention and the granting of an interlocutory injunction, were nugatory; and the judgments of the trial court must be

Reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyatt, Justice.

This court having held that the trial court erred in over- ■ ruling a general demurrer to the petition (Hoffman v. Chester, ante), it follows that subsequent proceedings, including the allowance of an intervention and the granting of an interlocutory injunction, were nugatory; and the judgments of the trial court must be

Reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 S.E.2d 771, 204 Ga. 311, 1948 Ga. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-chester-ga-1948.