Hoffman v. Carter
This text of 192 A. 825 (Hoffman v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court; except, however, that the affirmance as to Columbia Broadcasting System, Incorporated, is upon the ground that it was not served with process. We reserve decision as to whether the delivery at radio receivers in this state of programs transmitted by the Columbia company from its New York studio in any sense or to any degree constituted the doing of business by it in this state.
*380 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 10.
For affirmance in part — Perskie, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 3.
For reversal — Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 2.
For reversal in part — Hetfield, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 A. 825, 118 N.J.L. 379, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffman-v-carter-nj-1937.