Hoffman Mining Company, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adams Township

981 A.2d 1284, 603 Pa. 68, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2020
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 22, 2009·No. 537 WAL 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania commit an error of law by affirming the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County, which affirmed the Adams Township Zoning Hearing Board’s ruling that the Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act (the “SMCRA”) Act [sic] of November 30, 1971, (P.L. 554, No. 147), 52 P.S. § 1396.1 to 1396.31, does not preempt Section 1413, Paragraph 5, of the Adams Township Zoning Ordinance barring mining activities within 1,000 feet of a residential structure?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoffman Mining Company, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adams Township, 981 A.2d 1284, 603 Pa. 68, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2020 (Pa. 2009).

981 A.2d 1284 (Hoffman Mining Company, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adams Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman Mining Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board
32 A.3d 587 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)