Hoffiz v. Valdes-Fauli, Cobb & Petrey, P.A.
632 So. 2d 1078, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1321, 1994 WL 51815
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 22, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1188
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 632 So. 2d 1078 (Hoffiz v. Valdes-Fauli, Cobb & Petrey, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoffiz v. Valdes-Fauli, Cobb & Petrey, P.A., 632 So. 2d 1078, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1321, 1994 WL 51815 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
We affirm the summary judgment for the defendants which is challenged on the main appeal. On the cross-appeal, the order dismissing the counterclaim is reversed on the authority of Allie v. Ionata, 503 So.2d 1237 (Fla.1987) and Johnson v. Allen, Knudsen, DeBoest, Edwards & Rhodes, PA., 621 So.2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Ramos
632 So. 2d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 1078, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1321, 1994 WL 51815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffiz-v-valdes-fauli-cobb-petrey-pa-fladistctapp-1994.