Hoffart v. Voeller

517 N.W.2d 631, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 118
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1994
DocketCiv. No. 930406
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 517 N.W.2d 631 (Hoffart v. Voeller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoffart v. Voeller, 517 N.W.2d 631, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 118 (N.D. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gary Hoffart appealed from a summary judgment entered in county court denying Hoffart’s petition to probate a codicil to the will of Joseph Voeller, entered on a “Motion for Summary Judgment on Petition for Probate of a Codicil,” filed by Voeller’s children. Distribution of the estate has not been approved; discharge of the personal representative is not final; no Rule 54(b), NDRCivP, certification has been made. The judgment is a partial summary judgment; it is not final, and it is not appealable. Central Power Elec. Co-op v. C-K, Inc., 512 N.W.2d 711 (N.D.1994); Matter of Estate ofStarcher, 447 N.W.2d 293 (N.D.1989); Matter of Estate of Erickson, 368 N.W.2d 525 (N.D.1985); Cf. Meyer v. City of Dickinson, 397 N.W.2d 460 (N.D.1986).

The appeal is dismissed.

VANDE WALLE, C.J., and SANDSTROM, NEUMANN, LEVINE and MESCHKE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Estate of Voeller
517 N.W.2d 631 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 N.W.2d 631, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffart-v-voeller-nd-1994.