Hoffart v. Voeller
This text of 517 N.W.2d 631 (Hoffart v. Voeller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary Hoffart appealed from a summary judgment entered in county court denying Hoffart’s petition to probate a codicil to the will of Joseph Voeller, entered on a “Motion for Summary Judgment on Petition for Probate of a Codicil,” filed by Voeller’s children. Distribution of the estate has not been approved; discharge of the personal representative is not final; no Rule 54(b), NDRCivP, certification has been made. The judgment is a partial summary judgment; it is not final, and it is not appealable. Central Power Elec. Co-op v. C-K, Inc., 512 N.W.2d 711 (N.D.1994); Matter of Estate ofStarcher, 447 N.W.2d 293 (N.D.1989); Matter of Estate of Erickson, 368 N.W.2d 525 (N.D.1985); Cf. Meyer v. City of Dickinson, 397 N.W.2d 460 (N.D.1986).
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 N.W.2d 631, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoffart-v-voeller-nd-1994.