Hoff v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoff v. Young

251 A.D. 877, 298 N.Y.S. 751, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8077

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 877 (Hoff v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoff v. Young, 251 A.D. 877, 298 N.Y.S. 751, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appeHant to abide the event, on the ground that the finding of the jury that ownership of the car causing the injury was in the defendant Thomas F. Young is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Crosby and Cunningham, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment awards damages for personal injuries in an automobffe negUgence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appeHant to abide the event, on the ground that the finding of the jury that ownership of the car causing the injury was in the defendant Thomas F. Young is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Crosby and Cunningham, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment awards damages for personal injuries in an automobffe negUgence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 877, 298 N.Y.S. 751, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoff-v-young-nyappdiv-1937.