Hoff v. Tucker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hoff v. Tucker

826 S.W.2d 908, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 585, 1992 WL 69076

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1992·No. No. 60622·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Elmer and Rosalie Hoff, appeal an order of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County striking appellants’ answer and counterclaim and entering a judgment of liability in favor of respondents, Clifford and Patty Tucker, as a sanction for appellants’ continued failure to submit to depositions in this unlawful detainer action. We affirm.

We find the decision of the trial court to be supported by substantial evidence and no error of law appears. As we also find no precedential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm the order of the circuit court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Elmer and Rosalie Hoff, appeal an order of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County striking appellants’ answer and counterclaim and entering a judgment of liability in favor of respondents, Clifford and Patty Tucker, as a sanction for appellants’ continued failure to submit to depositions in this unlawful detainer action. We affirm.

We find the decision of the trial court to be supported by substantial evidence and no error of law appears. As we also find no precedential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm the order of the circuit court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

Hoff v. Tucker, 826 S.W.2d 908, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 585, 1992 WL 69076 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

826 S.W.2d 908 (Hoff v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.