Hoff v. SPOELSTRA
759 N.W.2d 212
This text of 759 N.W.2d 212 (Hoff v. SPOELSTRA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoff v. SPOELSTRA, 759 N.W.2d 212 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Bonnie HOFF, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sandra SPOELSTRA, Suzanne Kensington and City of Marquette, Defendants-Appellants, and
Gerald R. Peterson, Jerry Irby and Stu Bradley, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
759 N.W.2d 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoff-v-spoelstra-mich-2009.