Hoff v. Lee

121 A. 599, 98 N.J.L. 883, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 298
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 121 A. 599 (Hoff v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoff v. Lee, 121 A. 599, 98 N.J.L. 883, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This' was an action for a mandamus to compel the police and fire pension commission of Trenton to place the name of relator, J. Wallace Hoff, upon the roll of members entitled to the benefit of the fund created by chapter 160. Pamph. L. 1920, p. 324. He died pendente Hie, and his administratrix has been substituted as relator. The pleadings were properly molded and judgment for a peremptory writ was awarded, and has been brought here by appeal.

The Supreme Court in a per curiam held that a peremptory writ should issue, concluding that the case was governed by Van Horn v. Donnelly, 96 N. J. L. 345, which has recently been affirmed in this court, post p. 909. We think this a correct disposition of the case at bar and that the judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCullough v. Hartpence
58 A.2d 233 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Guard v. Shimamura
37 Haw. 270 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A. 599, 98 N.J.L. 883, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoff-v-lee-nj-1923.