Hoey v. United States
308 U.S. 510, 60 S. Ct. 132, 84 L. Ed. 436, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 178
Opinion
The motion for a stay is denied. The decree is affirmed. Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. Union Pacific R. Co., 222 U. S. 541, 547-548; Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, 311-312; United States v. American Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402, 411.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoey v. United States, 308 U.S. 510, 60 S. Ct. 132, 84 L. Ed. 436, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 178 (1939).
308 U.S. 510 (Hoey v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ortiz
701 So. 2d 922 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
Williams v. United States
569 A.2d 97 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
State v. Kluttz
521 A.2d 178 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1987)
Scott v. State
473 So. 2d 1167 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
State v. McFadden
320 N.W.2d 608 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1982)
People v. Heil
364 N.E.2d 966 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1977)
People v. Calhoun
361 N.E.2d 55 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1977)
State v. Burrows
198 So. 2d 393 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1967)
The PEOPLE v. Quintana
223 N.E.2d 161 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Dooley
67 So. 2d 558 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1953)
Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United States
316 U.S. 74 (Supreme Court, 1942)
A. E. McDonald Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States
35 F. Supp. 132 (N.D. Texas, 1940)