Hoey v. Cloud
This text of 33 Misc. 764 (Hoey v. Cloud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is not sufficient evidence in this ease to support a finding either that the petitioner had obtained a renewal of the lease of the' premises in question from her lessor or that a renewal agreement was executed between the petitioner and her sub-tenant. While there is slight evidence relating to negotiations between the petitioner and a representative of her lessor, yet it does not appear that the agreement was consummated, and the verdict of the jury is without evidence to support it. .
Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Present: Beekmak, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.
Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Misc. 764, 67 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoey-v-cloud-nyappterm-1900.