Hoey v. Burnett
This text of 234 A.D. 787 (Hoey v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order directing judgment of foreclosure and sale and judgment entered thereon reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs to appellants, the three actions consolidated, the ease remitted to the Special Term and set down for trial on December 1, 1931, subject to the consent of the justice there presiding. Upon the failure of appellants to consent to proceed to trial, the order and the judgment are unanimously affirmed, with costs. Upon the pleadings and facts shown by the record, we deem it inequitable not to try all the issues involved in one consolidated action. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoey-v-burnett-nyappdiv-1931.