Hoey v. Alcazar Amusement Co.

197 Ill. App. 411
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 11, 1916·No. Gen. No. 21,055·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Contracts, § 377*—when letter by third, person purporting to accept cancellation properly excluded. In an action by a theatrical performer against a theatrical company to recover under a written contract for a performance given, and damages for refusal to permit plaintiff to fulfil the contract, held that a letter from a booking agency which negotiated the contract to the defendant purporting to accept for plaintiff defendant’s cancellation of the contract was properly excluded, there being no proof that it had any authority to so do, nor evidence justifying the cancellation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoey v. Alcazar Amusement Co., 197 Ill. App. 411 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

197 Ill. App. 411 (Hoey v. Alcazar Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lefler v. Board of School Inspectors
241 Ill. App. 229 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1926)