Hoey v. Alcazar Amusement Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Hoey v. Alcazar Amusement Co.

197 Ill. App. 411

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 11, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,055

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 Ill. App. 411 (Hoey v. Alcazar Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoey v. Alcazar Amusement Co., 197 Ill. App. 411 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Contracts, § 377*—when letter by third, person purporting to accept cancellation properly excluded. In an action by a theatrical performer against a theatrical company to recover under a written contract for a performance given, and damages for refusal to permit plaintiff to fulfil the contract, held that a letter from a booking agency which negotiated the contract to the defendant purporting to accept for plaintiff defendant’s cancellation of the contract was properly excluded, there being no proof that it had any authority to so do, nor evidence justifying the cancellation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Contracts, § 377*—when letter by third, person purporting to accept cancellation properly excluded. In an action by a theatrical performer against a theatrical company to recover under a written contract for a performance given, and damages for refusal to permit plaintiff to fulfil the contract, held that a letter from a booking agency which negotiated the contract to the defendant purporting to accept for plaintiff defendant’s cancellation of the contract was properly excluded, there being no proof that it had any authority to so do, nor evidence justifying the cancellation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 Ill. App. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoey-v-alcazar-amusement-co-illappct-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack