Hoerner v. Chrysler Financial Co.

21 A.D.3d 1253, 801 N.Y.S.2d 223
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoerner v. Chrysler Financial Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 A.D.3d 1254
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2005·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered July 9, 2004. The judgment, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint and the cross claim of defendants Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., Douglas J. Jank and Jay B. Jank against defendant Mary P Rossi.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hoerner v Chrysler Fin. Co. ([appeal No. 3] 21 AD3d 1254 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoerner v. Chrysler Financial Co., 21 A.D.3d 1253, 801 N.Y.S.2d 223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 1253 (Hoerner v. Chrysler Financial Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoerner v. Chrysler Financial Co.
21 A.D.3d 1254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)