Hoenle v. Hoenle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hoenle v. Hoenle

614 So. 2d 690, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3057, 1993 WL 66266

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1993

DocketNo. 92-01838

StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 690 (Hoenle v. Hoenle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoenle v. Hoenle, 614 So. 2d 690, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3057, 1993 WL 66266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Melitta A. Hoenle has appealed the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, and W. Paul Hoenle has filed a cross-appeal. We affirm on all issues except the trial court’s failure to award Mrs. Hoenle fees and costs. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.

Because the trial court’s award of assets to Mr. Hoenle and the income Mr. Hoenle continues to enjoy are greater than those Mrs. Hoenle will receive, we reverse the trial court’s order denying an award of fees and costs to Mrs. Hoenle. We direct the trial court, on remand, to award fees and costs to Mrs. Hoenle.

[691]*691Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Melitta A. Hoenle has appealed the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, and W. Paul Hoenle has filed a cross-appeal. We affirm on all issues except the trial court’s failure to award Mrs. Hoenle fees and costs. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.

Because the trial court’s award of assets to Mr. Hoenle and the income Mr. Hoenle continues to enjoy are greater than those Mrs. Hoenle will receive, we reverse the trial court’s order denying an award of fees and costs to Mrs. Hoenle. We direct the trial court, on remand, to award fees and costs to Mrs. Hoenle.

[691]*691Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 690, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3057, 1993 WL 66266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoenle-v-hoenle-fladistctapp-1993.