Hoenig v. Central Stamping Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoenig v. Central Stamping Co.

245 A.D. 833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 833 (Hoenig v. Central Stamping Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoenig v. Central Stamping Co., 245 A.D. 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

When plaintiff was lifting a ten-gaUon pot or urn almost UUed with coffee, one of the handles broke, the coffee spiUed and plaintiff’s right hand was scalded. On the trial of an action brought by him for damages, against the distributor and the manufacturer, his complaint was dismissed on the merits as to both defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal tif the complaint as to Central Stamping Company, the manufacturer, only. Judgment in so far as appealed from reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the determination is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

When plaintiff was lifting a ten-gaUon pot or urn almost UUed with coffee, one of the handles broke, the coffee spiUed and plaintiff’s right hand was scalded. On the trial of an action brought by him for damages, against the distributor and the manufacturer, his complaint was dismissed on the merits as to both defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal tif the complaint as to Central Stamping Company, the manufacturer, only. Judgment in so far as appealed from reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the determination is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoenig-v-central-stamping-co-nyappdiv-1935.