Hoelscher v. State

835 S.W.2d 401, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 923, 1992 WL 114335
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1992·No. No. 60872·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order denying his 24.035 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoelscher v. State, 835 S.W.2d 401, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 923, 1992 WL 114335 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

835 S.W.2d 401 (Hoelscher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.