Hoelscher v. Hoelscher

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hoelscher v. Hoelscher

513 S.W.3d 372, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1327, 2016 WL 7448318

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2016·No. ED 102875·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roy R. Hoelscher appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his .marriage to Rhonda M. Hoelscher. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roy R. Hoelscher appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his .marriage to Rhonda M. Hoelscher. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Hoelscher v. Hoelscher, 513 S.W.3d 372, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1327, 2016 WL 7448318 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

513 S.W.3d 372 (Hoelscher v. Hoelscher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.